Saturday, October 10, 2009

ISO 9001 Standards – Management Review

Posted by everise | ISO Quality Management System | Sunday 13 September 2009 6:46 am

ISO 9001 StandardsManagement Review

Review the quality management system at planned intervals to:- Assess possible opportunities for improvementEnsure a suitable, adequate, and effective system

- Evaluate the need for any changes to the system

- Consider the need for changes to the quality policy and objectives

Maintain records of the management reviews.

Inputs for management review must include information on:

- Results of audits

- Customer feedback

- Process performance and product conformity

- Status of preventive and corrective actions

- Follow-up actions from earlier reviews

- Changes that could affect the quality system

- Recommendations for improvement

Outputs from the management review must include any decisions and actions related to:

- Improvement of the effectiveness of the quality management system and its processes

- Improvement of product related to customer requirements

- Resource needs

ISO 9001 Standards – Design and Development


ISO 9001 Standards - Design and Development

Plan and control the product design and development. This planning must determine the:Identify problems and propose any necessary actions

- Stages of design and development

- Appropriate review, verification, and validation activities for each stage

- Responsibility and authority for design and development

The interfaces between the different involved groups must be managed to ensure effective communication and the clear assignment of responsibility. Update, as appropriate, the planning output during design and development.

NOTE: Design and development review, verification, and validation have distinct purposes. They can be conducted and recorded separately or in any combination, as deemed suitable for the product and the organization.

Determine product requirement inputs and maintain records. The inputs must include:

- Functional and performance requirements

- Applicable statutory and regulatory requirements

- Applicable information derived from similar designs

- Requirements essential for design and development

Review these inputs for adequacy. Resolve any incomplete, ambiguous, or conflicting requirements.

Document the outputs of the design and development process in a form suitable for verification against the inputs to the process. The outputs must:

- Meet design and development input requirements

- Provide information for purchasing, production, and service

- Contain or reference product acceptance criteria

- Define essential characteristics for safe and proper use

- Be approved before their release

Perform systematic reviews of design and development at suitable stages in accordance with planned arrangements to:

- Evaluate the ability of the results to meet requirements

- The reviews must include representatives of the functions concerned with the stage being reviewed. Maintain the results of reviews and subsequent follow-up actions.

ISO 9001 Standards – Control of Measuring and Monitoring Equipment


ISO 9001 Standards - Control of Measuring and Monitoring Equipment

Determine the monitoring and measurements to be made, and the required equipment, to provide evidence of product conformity. Use and control the monitoring and measuring devices to ensure that measurement capability is consistent with monitoring and measurement requirements.
Where necessary to ensure valid results:

- Calibrate and/or verify the measuring equipment at specified intervals or prior to use

- Calibrate the equipment to national or international standards (or record other basis)

- Adjust or re-adjust as necessary

- Identify the measuring equipment in order to determine its calibration status

- Safeguard them from improper adjustments

- Protect them from damage and deterioration

Assess and record the validity of prior results if the device is found to not conform to requirements. Maintain records of the calibration and verification results.

Confirm the ability of software used for monitoring and measuring for the intended application before its initial use (and reconfirmed as necessary).

NOTE: Confirming the ability of software to satisfy the intended application would typically include its verification and configuration management to maintain its suitability for use.

For More Information Please Visit http://www.iso9001-standard.us

ISO 14001:2004 Standards Contents


ISO 14000 is a series of international standards on environmental management. It provides a framework for the development of an environmental management system and the supporting audit programme.

The main thrust for its development came as a result of the Rio Summit on the Environment held in 1992.

ISO 14000 is an Environmental Management System (EMS), which requires that an organization consider the environmental aspects of its products and services.

Iso14000 approach forces you to take a hard look at all areas of your business that has an environmental impact.

Iso14000 is the world’s first series of Internationally accepted Standards for Environmental Management Systems (EMS).

Iso14000 elevates Environmental Management to a Strategic Level that can be applied to any organization, from any industry, anywhere in the world.

ISO 14000 is a series of voluntary standards and guideline reference documents.

The part of the overall management system that includes organizational structure, planning activities, responsibilities, practices, procedures, processes and resources for developing, implementing, achieving, reviewing and maintaining the environmental policy.

Iso14000 is the world’s first series of Internationally accepted Standards for Environmental Management Systems (EMS).

Iso14000 elevates Environmental Management to a Strategic Level that can be applied to any organization, from any industry, anywhere in the world.

ISO 14000 is a series of voluntary standards and guideline reference documents.

The part of the overall management system that includes organizational structure, planning activities, responsibilities, practices, procedures, processes and resources for developing, implementing, achieving, reviewing and maintaining the environmental policy.

ISO 14000 is an Environmental Management System (EMS) who’s purpose is:

· A management commitment to pollution prevention.

· An understanding of the environmental impacts (reducing) of an organization’s activities.

A commitment (pollution prevention) to employees, neighbors and customers

ISO 14001 is the corner stone standard of the ISO 14000 series. It specifies a framework of control for an Environmental Management System against which an organization can be certified by a third party.

The environment cannot be protected by our convictions or goodwill alone. Efforts to protect the environment must be planned, coordinated and organized into a system, such as ISO 14001.

ISO14001 requires an Environmental Policy to be in existence within the organisation, fully supported by senior management, and outlining the policies of the company, not only to the staff but to the public. The policy needs to clarify compliance with Environmental Legislation that may effect the organization and stress a commitment to continuous improvement. Emphasis has been placed on policy as this provides the direction for the remainder of the Management System.

Those companies who have witnessed ISO9000 Assessments will know that the policy is frequently discussed during the assessment, many staff are asked if they understand or are aware of the policy, and any problems associated with the policy are seldom serious. The Environmental Policy is different, this provides the initial foundation and direction for the Management System and will be more stringently reviewed than a similar ISO9000 policy. The statement must be publicised in non-technical language so that it can be understood by the majority of readers. It should relate to the sites within the organisation encompassed by the Management System, it should provide an overview of the company’s activities on the site and a description of those activities. A clear picture of the company’s operations.

The preparatory review and definition of the organization’s environmental effects is not part of a ISO14001 Assessment, however examination of this data will provide an external audit with a wealth of information on the methods adopted by the company. The preparatory review itself should be comprehensive in consideration of input processes and output at the site. This review should be designed to identify all relevant environmental aspects that may arise from existence on the site. These may relate to current operations, they may relate to future, perhaps even unplanned future activities, and they will certainly relate to the activities performed on site in the past (i.e. contamination of land).

The initial or preparatory review will also include a wide-ranging consideration of the legislation which may effect the site, whether it is currently being complied with, and perhaps even whether copies of the legislation are available. Many of the environmental assessments undertaken already have highlighted that companies are often unaware of ALL of the legislation that affects them, and being unaware, are often not meeting the requirements of that legislation.

The company will declare its primary environmental objectives, those that can have most environmental impact. In order to gain most benefit these will become the primary areas of consideration within the improvement process, and the company’s environmental program. The program will be the plan to achieve specific goals or targets along the route to a specific goal and describe the means to reach those objectives such that they are real and achievable. The Environmental Management System provides further detail on the environmental program. The EMS establishes procedures, work instructions and controls to ensure that implementation of the policy and achievement of the targets can become a reality. Communication is a vital factor, enabling people in the organisation to be aware of their responsibilities, aware of the objectives of the scheme, and able to contribute to its success.

As with ISO9000 the Environmental Management System requires a planned comprehensive periodic audit of the Environmental Management System to ensure that it is effective in operation, is meeting specified goals, and the system continues to perform in accordance with relevant regulations and standards. The audits are designed to provide additional information in order to exercise effective management of the system, providing information on practices which differ to the current procedures or offer an opportunity for improvement.

In addition to audit, there is a requirement for Management Review of the system to ensure that it is suitable (for the organization and the objectives) and effective in operation. The management review is the ideal forum to make decisions on howe to improve for the future.

The newly revised ISO 14001:2004 specifies the requirements for an environmental management system (EMS), which provides a framework for an organization to control the environmental impacts of its activities, products and services, and to continually improve its environmental performance. It applies to those environmental aspects which the organization can control and over which it can be expected to have an influence. It does not itself state specific environmental performance criteria. ISO 14001:2004 is applicable to any organization that wishes to:

· implement, maintain and improve an environmental management system

· assure itself of its conformance with its stated environmental policy

· demonstrate such conformance to others

· seek certification/registration of its environmental management system by an external organization

· make a self-determination and self-declaration of conformance with this international standard.

All the requirements in this standard can be incorporated into any environmental management system. Having been revised, the improved ISO 14001 is now expected to bring the benefits of implementing an EMS to more businesses than ever. The standard is now easier to understand and use and has more detailed checklists for inputs and outputs from the management review and has increased compatibility to ISO 9001. Organizations who are currently registered to ISO 14001:1996 will have an 18-month transition period to register to ISO 14001:2004.

ISO 9001 Standards New Blogs

Some of the new blogs on ISO 9001 Standards & ISO 14001 standards was found as below:

http://iso14000standards.blogspot.com/

http://iso-9001-standards.blogspot.com/

http://iso14001environmentmanagementsystem.blogspot.com/

http://iso9001qualitymanagementsystem.blogspot.com/

http://iso9001qualitymanual.blogspot.com/

http://iso9000standards.blogspot.com/

http://iso9001-standards.blogspot.com/

http://iso14001standards.blogspot.com/

ADVANTAGES ACHIEVED BY THE IMPLEMENTATION OF Quality Management System

ADVANTAGES ACHIEVED BY THE IMPLEMENTATION OF Quality Management System (QMS)

- An Romania Perspective

The assurance of quality of the delivered products and services has always represented the main goal of any organisation which wants to be on the market. The concept of „quality” is larger than in the past, referring also to management aspects. Thus, the quality of products and services does not represent only a goal, but a consequence of the quality of the whole managerial activities, workers, and even a quality of partnerships. Modern industrial reorganisations are usually realised through the strategies of quality management, due to the fact that these are able to release the continuous and substantial improvements of the economical agents’ performances.

Within such a frame, one possibility for an organisation to maintain and to gain new positions on a market is to design, to implement and to certificate a Quality Management System (QMS), system through which all processes are controlled.

The Romanian pharmaceutical market is currently restricted as volume and value compared to other countries in the region. Joining the European Union and future improvement of living conditions will mean increase of pharmaceutical expenses per person, considering the fact that the demand for pharmaceutical products (medication) is not influenced by the evolution of prices. After 1990, foreign manufacturers have become interested in the increasing potential of Romania, a country of 22 million inhabitants with a very low intake of drugs per person, due to the low living standard. They have penetrated the market through direct import companies, through license agreements, acquisitions and privatizations.

Romanian manufacturers have tried to shift their direction towards export, but the barrier represented by the Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP – for production) and ISO 9001:2000 standards (for distribution) has stopped their penetration of new markets. Their exports mainly targeted Russia, Moldova and former socialist countries. Without norms of this kind, also known as standards, today’s international trade would be inconceivable because every product would have to be checked in keeping with individual criteria. Norms, therefore, create comparability.

Nowadays, the external market has, for several companies, the same importance as the domestic one. The conquest of external market is essential because it brings currency, improves commercial balance, creates new working places and promotes the managerial or technological know-how transfer.

ISO 9000 is a generic name given to a family of standards developed to provide a framework around which a quality management system can be effectively implemented. These standards were developed mainly to facilitate commercial relationships and to increase the confidence of consumers in the capability of a supplier to constantly satisfy the requirements of products and services quality.

The paper presents some advantages achieved by implementation of Quality Management System in pharmaceutical industry, namely S.C. X Company S.A from Tirgu-Mures, one of the most important producer and distributor of pharmaceutical products in Romania.

Using a proven management system combined with ongoing external validation, enables the X Company to continually renew its strategies, domestic and external operations and service level. To this respect, the paper presents the main steps in implementing the Quality Management System within this organisation and some benefits of the registration such as increasing domestic sales, but most off all, the penetration and increasing sales on external markets.

The ISO 9000 family of standards represents an international consensus on good quality management practices. It consists of standards and guidelines related to quality management systems and related supporting standards.

ISO 9001:2000 is the standard that provides a set of standardized requirements for a quality management system, regardless of what the user organization does, its size, or whether it is in the private, or public sector. It is the only standard in the family against which organizations can be certified – although certification is not a compulsory requirement of the standard.

The other standards in the family cover specific aspects such as fundamentals and vocabulary, performance improvements, documentation, training, and financial and economic aspects. Implementing a Quality Management System within an organisation needs to be a decision of top management. The objective of the quality system needs to be clearly defined so that the system can be effective. The design and implementation of quality management system will vary depending on the type, size and products of the organisation and should be used in conjunction with the ISO 9000:2000 standards. Implementing a Quality Management System is not that difficult as it seems, the key is planning and commitment. How complex or simple the QMS is depends entirely on the organisation and what the objectives are. It can be a simple guide to the organisation policy and procedures, or it can document every task and procedure. It really depends on how much risk is involved and how much control is required.

The documentation of QMS involves:

1. The policy to refer to quality, the objectives of quality and the book of quality (Quality Management System)

2. Management Responsibility

3. Resource Management

4. Product Realisation

5. Measurements, Analysis and Improvement

A well managed quality system will have impact on:

1. customer loyalty and repeat business

2. market share

3. operational efficiencies

4. flexibility and ability to respond to market opportunities

5. effective and efficient use of resources

6. cost reductions

7. competitive advantages

ISO 9001 Standards – Documented Procedures

ISO 9001 Standards – Documented Procedures

The standard requires the management system documentation to include documented procedures required by ISO 9001 Standards.

ISO 9000 defines a procedure as a specified way to carry out an activity or a process. This definition is ambiguous because an activity is on a different scale than a process. Process outputs are dependent upon many factors of which activities are but one. An activity is the smallest unit of work. Several activities accomplish a task and several tasks reflect the stages in a process but there is more to a process than a series of tasks. This definition also esults in a belief that procedures are documented processes but this too is inaccurate. Procedures tell us how to proceed dont need to produce any others. The specific procedures required are:

(a) A documented procedure for document control

(b) A documented procedure for the control of records

(c) A documented procedure for conducting audits

(d) A documented procedure for nonconformity control

(e) A documented procedure for corrective action

(f) A documented procedure for preventive action

These areas all have something in common. They are what the authors of the early drafts of ISO 9000 :2008 referred to as system procedures ? they apply to the whole system and are not product, process or customer specific although it is not uncommon for customers to specify requirements that would impact these areas. Why procedures for these aspects are required and not for other aspects of the management system is unclear but it seems that the authors of ISO 9000 felt these were not processes ? a conclusion I find difficult to justify.

They are certainly not business processes but could be work processes. However, there is another message that this requirement conveys. It is that procedures are not required for each clause of the standard. Previously, countless organizations produced a manual of 20 procedures to match the 20 elements of ISO 9001. Some limited their procedures to the 26 procedures cited by the standard and others produced as many as were necessary to respond to the requirements.

Document control is a work process or a number of work processes because the inputs pass through a number of stages each adding value to result in the achievement of defined objectives. These are the acquisition, approval, publication, distribution, storage, maintenance, improvement, and disposal stages. These are not tasks but processes that achieve defined objectives and involve both physical, financial and human resources. Within these processes are tasks, each of which may require documented procedures as they are initiated.

Control of records is also a work process similar to document control. There are the preparation, storage, access, maintenance and disposal stages. This is not one uninterrupted flow but a life cycle. There is not one task but several performed at different times for different reasons.

Auditing is certainly a process with a defined objective. Without the provision of competent personnel and a suitable environment, audits will not achieve their objectives no matter how many times the procedure is implemented.

Nonconformity control like records control is a work process for the same reasons. The sequence of tasks is not in the form of an uninterrupted sequence. The sequence of stages may be identification, documentation, segregation, review, remedial action and disposal but this is not a continuous sequence. There are breaks and different procedures may apply at each stage depending on what it is that is nonconforming.

There is little merit in having one corrective action procedure when the source of problems that require corrective action is so varied. One Corrective Action Form might be appropriate but its application will be so varied that it is questionable whether one size fits all. Presenting top management with a nonconformity report because it has been detected that the organization charts are not promptly updated following a change, will not motivate them into action. Corrective action forms part of every process rather than being a separate process. It is unreasonable to force all actions aimed at preventing the recurrence of problems through one process. Many problems are prevented from recurring not by following a procedure, but by the designer, the producer, supplier, manager remembering they had a problem last time and doing it differently the next ? i.e. they learn from their mistakes. No forms filled in, no procedures followed ? just people using their initiative ? this is why corrective action is part of every process operation.

Preventive action remains one of the most misunderstood requirements of ISO 9001 because it is mistaken for corrective action but more on this. There is even less justification for one preventive action procedure because the source of potential problems is so varied. Preventive actions are taken in design, in planning, in training and in maintenance under the name of FMEA, Reliability Prediction, Quality Planning, Production Planning, Logistic Planning, Staff Development, Equipment Maintenance ? preventive actions are built into these processes and similar to corrective action are part of every process design.

Continual improvement in the quality management system

Continual Improvement In The Quality Management System

The ISO 9001 standard requires the organization to continually improve the effectiveness of the quality management system in accordance with the requirements of ISO 9001 and to implement action necessary to achieve planned results and continual improvement of the identified processes.

ISO 9000 defines continual improvement as a recurring activity to increase the ability to fulfil requirements. As the organization’s objectives are its requirements, continually improving the effectiveness of the quality management system means continually increasing the ability of the organization to fulfil its objectives.

If the performance of a process parameter is currently meeting the standard that has been established, there are several improvement actions you can take:

Raise the standard e.g. if the norm for the sales ratio of orders won to all orders bid is 60%, an improvement programme could be developed for raising the standard to 75% or higher

Increase efficiency e.g. if the time to process an order is within limits, identify and eliminate wasted resources

Increase effectiveness e.g. if you bid against all customer requests, by only bidding for those you know you can win you improve your hit rate

You can call all these actions improvement actions because they clearly improve performance. However, we need to distinguish between being better at what we do now and doing new things. Some may argue that improving efficiency is being better at what we do now, and so it is – but if in order to improve efficiency we have to be innovative we are truly reaching new standards. Forty years ago, supervisors in industry would cut an eraser in half in the name of efficiency rather than hand out two erasers. Clearly this was a lack of trust disguised as efficiency improvement and it had quite the opposite effect. In fact they were not only increasing waste but also creating a hostile environment.

Each of the improvement actions is dealt with later in the book and the subject of continual improvement addressed again under Quality planning.

There are several steps to undertaking continual improvement:

1. Determine current performance

2 Establish the need for change

3 Obtain commitment and define the improvement objectives

4 Organize diagnostic resources

5 Carry out research and analysis to discover the cause of current performance

6 Define and test solutions that will accomplish the improvement objectives

7 Product improvement plans which specify how and by whom the changes will be implemented

8 Identify and overcome any resistance to change

9 Implement the change

10 Put in place controls to hold new levels of performance and repeat step one

For more information, please visit http://www.iso9001-standard.us

What is a “document” In ISO 9001 Standard?

What is a “document” In ISO 9001 Standard?

The following are some of the main objectives of an organization’s documentation, independent of whether or not it has implemented a formal QMS;
a) Communication of Information as a tool for information transmission and communication. The type and extent of the documentation will depend on the nature of the organization’s products and processes, the degree of formality of communication systems and the level of communication skills within the organization, and the organizational culture.
b) Evidence of conformity provision of evidence that what was planned, has actually been done.
c) Knowledge sharing to disseminate and preserve the organization’s experiences. A typical example would be a technical specification, which can be used as a base for design and development of a new product.
A list of commonly used terms relating to documentation is presented in Annex A (taken from ISO 9000:2005). It must be stressed that, according to ISO 9001:2008 clause 4.2 Documentation requirements documents may be in any form or type of medium, and the definition of “document” in ISO 9000:2005 clause 3.7.2 gives the following examples:
paper
magnetic
electronic or optical computer disc
photograph
master sample

Organizations preparing to implement a QMS For ISO 9001


Organizations preparing to implement a QMS For ISO 9001

For organizations that are in the process of implementing a QMS, and wish to meet the requirements of ISO 9001:2008, the following comments may be useful.
For organizations that are in the process of implementing or have yet to implement a QMS, ISO 9001:2008 emphasizes a process approach. This includes:
- Identifying the processes necessary for the effective implementation of the quality management system
- understanding the interactions between these processes.
- documenting the processes to the extent necessary to assure their effective operation and control. (It may be
appropriate to document the processes using process maps. It is emphasized, however, that documented process maps are not a requirement of ISO 9001:2008.)
These processes include the management, resource, product realization and measurement processes that are relevant
to the effective operation of the QMS.
Analysis of the processes should be the driving force for defining the amount of documentation needed for the quality management system, taking into account the requirements of ISO 9001:2008. It should not be the documentation that drives the processes.

Outsourced Processes In ISO 9001 Standards


Outsourced Processes In ISO 9001 Standards

One of the changes in ISO 9001:2008 is clarification of the role of outsourced processes in a quality management system. Guidance on ‘Outsourced processes’ helps clarify the intent and shows the linkage between Clause 4.2, where outsourced processes appear, and the purchasing controls in clause 7.4.
An outsourced process is a process that the organization needs for its quality management system and is performed by an external party. This party could be another company, a corporate service, another division, etc.
The organization needs to ensure the outsourced process is conducted in accordance with ISO 9001:2008 and other requirements of the quality management system. This brings in the purchasing controls of 7.4. The service may not be purchased in the traditional sense of a monetary transaction. The guidance document explains that the controls in clause 4.2 and 7.4 apply. For example, a “no charge” service from a corporate head office requires documentation of supplier selection and, most importantly, control.
The guidance document addresses two important cases and gives guidance on the appropriate level of control. The cases are:
• The organization has the competence and ability to carry out a process, but chooses to outsource it (for commercial or other reasons).
• The organization does not have the competence to carry out the process itself, and chooses to outsource it.

Demonstrating conformity with ISO 9001:2008


Demonstrating conformity with ISO 9001:2008

For organizations wishing to demonstrate conformity with the requirements of ISO 9001:2008, for the purposes of certification/registration, contractual, or other reasons, it is important to remember the need to provide evidence of the effective implementation of the QMS.
Organizations may be able to demonstrate conformity without the need for extensive documentation.
To claim conformity with ISO 9001:2008, the organization has to be able to provide objective evidence of the effectiveness of its processes and its quality management system. Clause 3.8.1 of ISO 9000:2005 defines “objective evidence” as “data supporting the existence or variety of something” and notes that “objective evidence may be obtained through observation, measurement, test, or other means.”
Objective evidence does not necessarily depend on the existence of documented procedures, records or other documents, except where specifically mentioned in ISO 9001:2008. In some cases, (for example, in clause 7.1(d)
Planning of product realization, and clause 8.2.4

Monitoring and measurement of product), it is up to the organization to determine what records are necessary in order to provide this objective evidence.
Where the organization has no specific internal procedure for a particular activity, and this is not required by the standard, (for example, clause 5.6 Management Review), it is acceptable for this activity to be conducted using as a basis the relevant clause of ISO 9001:2008. In these situations, both internal and external audits may use the text of ISO 9001:2008 for conformity assessment purposes.

Records required by ISO 9001:2008


Records required by ISO 9001:2008

Clause Record required
5.6.1 Management reviews
6.2.2 e) Education, training, skills and experience
7.1 d) Evidence that the realization processes and resulting product fulfil requirements
7.2.2 Results of the review of requirements related to the product and actions arising from the review
7.3.2 Design and development inputs relating to product requirements
7.3.4 Results of design and development reviews and any necessary actions
7.3.5 Results of design and development verification and any necessary actions
7.3.6 Results of design and development validation and any necessary actions
7.3.7 Results of the review of design and development changes and any necessary actions
7.4.1 Results of supplier evaluations and any necessary actions arising from the evaluations
7.5.2 d) As required by the organization to demonstrate the validation of processes where the resulting output cannot be verified by subsequent monitoring or measurement
7.5.3 The unique identification of the product, where traceability is a requirement
7.5.4 Customer property that is lost, damaged or otherwise found to be unsuitable for use
7.6 a) Basis used for calibration or verification of measuring equipment where no international or national measurement standards exist
7.6 Validity of the previous measuring results when the measuring equipment is found not to conform to requirements
7.6 Results of calibration and verification of measuring equipment
8.2.2 Internal audit results and follow-up actions
8.2.4 Indication of the person(s) authorizing release of product.
8.3 Nature of the product nonconformities and any subsequent actions taken, including concessions obtained
8.5.2 e) Results of corrective action
8.5.3 d) Results of preventive action

Friday, October 9, 2009

ISO 9001:2008 Documentation Requirements

ISO 9001:2008 Documentation Requirements

ISO 9001:2008 clause 4.1 General requirements requires an organization to “establish, document, implement, and maintain a quality management system and continually improve its effectiveness in accordance with the requirements of this International Standard”

Clause 4.2.1 General explains that the quality management system documentation shall include:

documented statements of a quality policy and quality objectives;

a quality manual documented procedures required by this International Standard documents needed by the organization to ensure the effective planning, operation and control of its processes, and records required by this International Standard;

The notes after Clause 4.2 make it clear that where the standard specifically requires a “documented procedure”, the procedure has to be established, documented, implemented and maintained. It also emphasizes that the extent of the QMS documentation may differ from one organization to another due to:

the size of organization and type of activities;

the complexity of processes and their interactions, and

the competence of personnel.

All the documents that form part of the QMS have to be controlled in accordance with clause 4.2.3 of ISO 9001:2008, or, for the particular case of records, according to clause 4.2.4.

SUMMARY OF CHANGES TO ISO 14001:2004

SUMMARY OF CHANGES TO ISO 14001:2004

ISO 14001:2004 aims to clarify the 1996 edition and align it more closely with the ISO 9001:2000 standard. Some clauses have not been modified for content but have been rewritten to align ISO 14001:2004 with the format, wording, and layout of ISO 9001:2000 and to enhance the compatibility between the two standards.

References in Annex A of the standard are aligned with the numbering in the standard for ease of use. Annex B of the standard identifies similarities and associations between ISO 9001:2000 and ISO 14001:2004.

An important change in wording throughout the revised standard appears in requirements that previously stated that an organisation shall “establish and maintain”; these have now been changed to “establish, implement and maintain”.

Throughout the standard the word “personnel” in the original standard is replaced with “persons working for or on behalf of the organisation” in the revised standard. This is included to ensure that external contractors and applicable suppliers are included under the requirements of certain clauses.

In developing, implementing and maintaining the organisation’s EMS, significant environmental aspects, applicable legal requirements and other requirements to which the organisation subscribes must be considered, and management must ensure the availability of resources.

There are additional paragraphs in the introduction, which generally cover:

• the aim of the ISO 14001:2004 standard is to enhance compatibility with ISO 9001:2000;

• alignment is improved between clause references and supporting Annexes. For example, 4.3.3 and A.3.3 both deal with objectives, targets and programme(s), and 4.5.5 and A.5.5 both deal with internal audit;

• an explanation of the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) model used in ISO 9001:2000;

• the use of the process approach is promoted in alignment with ISO 9001:2000;

• possible alignment and integration with other management systems is reviewed.

Change In ISO 14001:2004 – Documentation

Change In ISO 14001:2004 – Documentation

This clause has been updated to align it with ISO 19001:2004, but has not changed in intent. The listed EMS documentation now includes:

• the environmental policy,

• objectives and targets,

• a description of the scope of the EMS,

• a description of the main elements of the EMS and their interaction and reference to related documents, documents and records

• required by the standard, • documents and records determined by the organisation as necessary to ensure the effective planning, operation and control of processes that relate to the significant environmental aspects.

Formatting changes help align Clause 4.4.5 of ISO 14001:2004 with ISO 9001:2000. An additional clarification has been made to define records as a special type of document requiring control under Clause 4.5.4. A new addition to the requirements aims to ensure documents of external origin, (i.e. MSDS, permits) that are necessary to the system, are identified and their distribution is controlled.

Formatting changes help align Clause 4.4.5 of ISO 14001:2004 with ISO 9001:2000. An additional clarification has been made to define records as a special type of document requiring control under Clause 4.5.4. A new addition to the requirements aims to ensure documents of external origin, (i.e. MSDS, permits) that are necessary to the system, are identified and their distribution is controlled.

The revised standard requires documents required by the EMS and the standard to be controlled documents.

Note that “document” is included in the definitions, and includes its supporting medium which can be paper, magnetic, electronic or optical computer disc, photograph or master sample, or a combination thereof.

ISO 14001:2004 Evaluation of compliance


ISO 14001:2004 Evaluation of compliance

This clause has been separated from 4.5.1 and includes two sub-clauses, as well as clarification and an addition to the ISO 14001:1996 standard. Included in Clause 4.5.1 of ISO 14001:1996 was a requirement for the organisation to periodically evaluate compliance with relevant (now applicable) environmental legislation and regulations. This requirement has been retained in Clause 4.5.2.1 of the revised standard. In Clause 4.5.2.2, ISO 14001:2004 includes evaluation of compliance with other requirements to which the organisation subscribes, which was not specifically required by ISO 14001:1996. This clarification also includes a requirement for records of periodic evaluations of compliance to be kept.

The UK-based Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment (IEMA) has published an opinion that this means that compliance against each and every piece of legislation / regulation relating to an organisation’s environmental aspects will need to be evaluated before it can be considered to be in conformity with ISO 14001: 2004; it will not be acceptable for organisations to claim that the periodic evaluation will be covered by their internal EMS audit program at some future date.

This has always been one of the most difficult issues in ISO 14001:2004, and organisations will need to review and revise their compliance procedures to ensure that they meet these new requirements.

KEY CONSIDERATIONS IN IMPLEMENTING ISO 9001 IN SMEs

KEY CONSIDERATIONS IN IMPLEMENTING ISO 9001 IN SMEs

There are many issues that must be addressed in moving the QMS from the initial state to the desired state. For example, all organizations implementing ISO 9001 will need to consider the unique culture within the organization, its size, and the resources available. Beyond those widely discussed points, three issues that merit particular attention are (1) consideration of the QMS as a parallel function, (2) training, and (3) auditing. Key points associated with these issues are discussed below.

Consideration of QMS as Parallel Function

In the case of all of the transitions depicted, real benefits from the QMS are more likely to be experienced if the QMS is implemented directly into the core structure of the organization. SMEs must be cautious against establishing a QMS that is run separately in parallel to its other systems. In SMEs, the parallel subsystem most commonly exhibits itself as a separate Quality Assurance, or in some cases, ISO 9001 department. Possible reasons for this may include the existence of rigid departmental boundaries in some SMEs or overemphasis on core activities. As Yauch and Steudel [10] note, SMEs tend to focus their attention on “…necessary routine activities (such as sales, production, shipping, etc.) rather than activities aimed at improving processes or systems.” If a SME insists on establishing a separate quality department, its level of effectiveness can be increased by embedding the QMS in widely-used organizational systems where practical. The integration is largely a function of how well the QMS manages to share information with other subsystems and its ability to align with the policies, norms, goals, and values in place throughout the organization.

Training

In SMEs, training and staff development is more likely to be ad hoc and small scale because of modest human and financial resources and the absence of a specific training budget. To prevent the problems arising from lack of education and training, two things must be done:

1. Education of Top Management: The centralization of decision-making processes within many SMEs means that the management can either be the main stumbling block to change or the main catalyst for change. Therefore, any approach to ISO 9001 implementation must involve considerable education for the top management of the organization to create awareness and understanding of the implementation process as a change initiative. Implementing a fully functional and documented QMS requires motivation by top management to appreciate, achieve, and implement the necessary measures to meet the standards’ criteria.

2. Education and Training of Employees: SMEs are often under pressure to quickly gain ISO 9001 registration. Meeting the requirements of the standard in a short period of time can prove a formidable obstacle for a small company. Since most SMEs do not possess the needed expertise internally, they may be inclined to hire external experts to provide the necessary technical expertise and manpower. However, having a functioning and documented QMS requires more than that. It requires ensuring that all employees in the organization clearly know what is expected of them and how they can contribute to the attainment of their organizations’ goals. This will likely require the preparation and implementation of a training plan tailored specifically to the unique characteristics and maturity level of the SME.

Auditing

As emphasized throughout the paper, a QMS is not going to produce the expected results unless it is fully functional. While auditing must therefore verify the existence of the necessary documentation, it must also focus on the functionality of the QMS. The measurement of the functionality and the qualitative and financial impacts of a QMS have been the subject of several studies, including Kaynak [11]. Among the categories used to measure functionality and performance improvement, two are particularly noteworthy for our purposes: management commitment and employee involvement. A QMS cannot be functional in the absence of those two characteristics. Therefore, as a minimum, internal and external auditors should continually verify top management’s commitment to increased company-wide quality awareness and improvement in addition to employee involvement in the design, implementation, operation, and improvement of quality related processes and procedures.

Saturday, October 3, 2009

ISO 9001 quality system

The latest revision, ISO 9001:2008 – which has just been published – has a greater focus on how companies meet customer needs, integrate those needs into the operation and evaluate customer feedback (see sidebar after article). It is the most extensive overhaul of the standard yet and requires top-level management leadership. The new updated standard is based on eight fundamental “best practices” that all organizations should have integrated into their business if they intend to keep up with their competition.Improved customer relations are only one of a number of benefits of adopting such a company-wide quality system. Following ISO 9001 improves communications both inside and outside the firm. It reduces rework, scrap and product returns. It builds better supplier relationships through improved communications and feedback. An ISO 9001 system helps to create a reliable system for documenting procedures, which helps set performance expectations, promote consistency and can reduce new employee training time.
The greatest obstacle to adopting an ISO 9001 quality system is understanding what compliance to the standard really means, and then implementing the requirements in a simple and easy-to-use system. Because the standard can be applied across all industries, a first step for most companies is deciding what parts of the standard apply and identifying where any system already in place needs to be improved or modified. Many companies get stuck trying to fit the standard to their situation rather than implementing the basic controls and checks/balances that ISO looks for. Here the experience of plastics professionals can help a moldmaker/molder by clarifying which requirements are needed, what areas are to be placed under document control, and the easiest methods to show evidence of quality related activities.

ISO 9001 Quality management and quality assurance

ISO 90001 is primarily concerned with quality management. The definition of “quality” in ISO 90001 refers to all those features of a product or a service which are required by the customer. Quality management means what the organization does to ensure that its products conform to the customer’s requirements.
ISO Guide 34:1996 Quality system guidelines for the production of reference materials
ISO 8402:1994 Quality management and quality assurance — Vocabulary
ISO 9000-1:1994 Quality management and quality assurance standards — Part 1: Guidelines for selection and use
ISO 9000-2:1997 Quality management and quality assurance standards — Part 2: Generic guidelines for the application of ISO 9001, ISO 9002 and ISO 9003
ISO 9000-3:1997 Quality management and quality assurance standards — Part 3: Guidelines for the application of ISO 9001:1994 to the development, supply, installation and maintenance of computer software
ISO 9000-4:1993 Quality management and quality assurance standards — Part 4: Guide to dependability program management
ISO 9001:1994 Quality systems — Model for quality assurance in design, development, production, installation and servicing
ISO 9002:1994 Quality systems — Model for quality assurance in production, installation and servicing
ISO 9003:1994 Quality systems — Model for quality assurance in final inspection and test
ISO 9004-1:1994 Quality management and quality system elements — Part 1: Guidelines
ISO 9004-2:1991 Quality management and quality system elements — Part 2: Guidelines for services
ISO 9004-3:1993 Quality management and quality system elements — Part 3: Guidelines for processed materials
ISO 9004-4:1993 Quality management and quality system elements — Part 4: Guidelines for quality Improvement

ISO 9001 Quality Standards

In 1987, mounting concern on global quality issues led the International Organization for Standardization, or ISO, headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland, to establish a series of international quality standards. Called the ISO 9000 Series of Standards, the series is not specific to any one industry, but when used with proper industry-specific standards, helps build a strong foundation for a quality system. The idea behind ISO is to promote standardization which will facilitate the international exchange of goods and services.
Currently, ISO 9000 certification is voluntary and not required or mandated in any country. However, the European community has recently required that quality systems of many suppliers of products related to health, safety, and the environment be formally registered, by a third party, according to the ISO 9001 Standard. This action has made adoption of the ISO 9001 standards a prerequisite for doing business in Europe. Countries in Asia, Africa, and South America are more and more considering adoption of these standards as a means to increased trade among themselves and the United States. Over 20,000 companies have been registered worldwide, and at least 52 nations are implementing the standards.
In the U.S., the ISO 9000 Series of Standards was adopted in precise format as the ANSI/ASQC Q90 series of standards. The series comprises five individual, but related, international standards on quality management and quality assurance, known as ISO 9000, 9001, 9002, 9003, and 9004. For a company’s quality system to become registered in one or more of these standards involves having an accredited, independent third party conduct an audit of the company’s operations against the requirements of the ISO 9001 standards. Upon successful completion of this audit, the company will receive a registration certificate that identifies its quality system as being in compliance with ISO 9001 standards.

ISO 9001 – Benefits and Problems

ISO 9000 has received much publicity. Some managers see it as a prerequisite for conducting business. For others, it substitutes for the difficulties and vagaries of Total Quality Management (TQM). Some see only a needless bureaucratic boondoggle. Depending on the situation, any of these views might be correct.
Sensibly applied, ISO 9000 is a qualifier for international markets or specific domestic customers. Certification can be a valuable marketing tool. The standards are a sound blueprint for a quality system. They can lead the way to the more difficult and sophisticated approaches of Total Quality Management. ISO 9000 can improve a company’s cost structure by 5%-20%.
Approached unwisely, ISO 9000 can be costly and unproductive. It may create a quality bureaucracy which adds to the cost structure and slows product development. It can focus people on paperwork instead of customers. It can divert management concentration and energy from more vital issues.

Revising the ISO 9001 Quality Manual

Revising the ISO 9000 quality procedures and the ISO 9000 quality manual should be a normal part of the ever-improving ISO 9000 quality system. These revisions can reach from small corrections to a total makeover of the entire ISO 9000 quality system. If you find your company’s ISO 9000 system to be bureaucratic and cumbersome, if you find your employees completely negative about ISO 9000, and if you end up extensively preparing for each audit, then your ISO 9000 system has plenty of opportunities for improvement and you should consider a complete makeover.
Problems related to ISO 9000It is not uncommon to find employees with negative opinions on ISO 9001. Most of them complain about excessive bureaucracy, much paperwork and extra work before audits. At the same time, they feel that there are no benefits to ISO 9001.
These problems are not the fault of ISO 9001 – these problems result from the way the ISO 9001 quality management system was implemented!

ISO 9000 Documentation

ISO 9001 requires several different documents: a quality manual, quality procedures, a quality policy and quality objectives; in addition, ISO 9001 requires work instructions that provide detailed guidelines to employees on how to perform their work. However, the ISO 9001 standard is very clear that work instructions need only be created where they add value (for example, a trained painter will not find value in instructions on how to paint; on the other hand, brief instructions (possibly in form of pictures), displayed right on a machine, explaining how to replace a filter could be a great time saver). Forms, which must be kept on file after they are filled in, are also part of any ISO 9001 quality management system. Some of the most typical forms are the Corrective Action Report Form, the Employee Review Form, and the Customer Survey. It is important to note that ISO 9001 does not directly require these forms; however, ISO 9001 calls for recording certain information and a well-designed form not only requires the information but it also walks the user through the process.

Wednesday, September 23, 2009

Scope Of The Quality Management System

Scope Of The Quality Management System
The ISO 9001 standard requires the quality manual to include the scope of the quality management system including details of justification for any exclusion. The standard addresses activities that may not be relevant or applicable to an organization. The permissible exclusions are explained in section 1.2 of ISO 9001. Here it states that the organization may only exclude requirements that neither affect the organization’s ability, nor its responsibility to provide product that meets customer and applicable regulatory requirements. The requirements for which exclusion is permitted are limited to those in section 7 of the standard.
Under ISO 9001:2008, it was possible for organizations to exclude functions and processes of their organization that may have been difficult to control or were not part of the order fulfilment cycle. Organizations that designed their own products but not for specific customers could escape bringing these operations into the management system. Marketing was omitted because it operated before placement of order. Accounting, Administration, Maintenance, Publicity, Public Relations and After Sales Support functions were often omitted because there were no requirements in the standard that specifically dealt with such activities. As there is no function in an organization that does not directly or indirectly serve the satisfaction of interested parties, it is unlikely that any function or process will now be excluded from the quality management system.
It is sensible to describe the scope of the quality management system so as to ensure effective communication. The scope of the quality management system is one area that generates a lot of misunderstanding particularly when dealing with auditors, consultants and customers. When you claim you have a management system that meets ISO 9001 it could imply that you design, develop, install and service the products you supply, when in fact you may only be a distributor. Why you need to justify specific exclusions is uncertain because it is more practical to justify inclusions.
The scope of the quality management system is the scope of the organization. There is no longer any reason to exclude locations, activities, functions or processes for which there is no requirement in the standard. The reason is because the ISO 9000 family now serves customer satisfaction and is not limited to quality assurance as were the 1994 versions of ISO 9001, ISO 9002 and ISO 9003.
It is not appropriate to address exclusions by inserting pages in the manual corresponding to the sections of the standard and adding justification if not within the scope of the management system – such as ‘We don’t do this!’.
It is much more appropriate to use an appendix as indicated previously in the manual contents list. By describing the nature of the business, you are establishing boundary conditions. If in doing so you do not mention that you design products, it will be interpreted that design is not applicable.
For exclusions relative to detail requirements, the Compliance Matrix may suffice but for an unambiguous solution, it is preferable to produce an exposition that addresses each requirement of the standard.